May 23, 2013

U.S. Financial Crisis

Democrats, Republicans & Tea Partiers Should Embrace Bailout’s Success and Move Forward

U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner

From the fall of 2008 through the spring of 2009 the federal government’s Troubled Asset Relief Program – or TARP – was branded ‘BAILOUT’ and beat mercilessly by the right, the left and the well-meaning but barely informed.

This very site lauded and at times railed against the $700 billion fund that saved the U.S. financial services industry and then the domestic auto business.  In a near-final analysis, I’m reminded of the conversation that every parent has had with every child:

Little Johnny, lip curled, tears streaming down face: “That’s not fair!”

Mom, literally at her wit’s end: “Life – isn’t fair.”

Oh, in the Insta-World to pause and look back.  I think in the early and mid 20th century they called it, reflection.

On the treadmill today, three bits of news had me pause for reflection about the bailout and the whole sordid economic and political affair surrounding it.  First, the bits of news.

U.S. Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner testified on foreclosure prevention and other bailout matters on Thursday before the Congressional Oversight Panel.  This panel was created when TARP was enacted by Congress and tracks and analyzes TARP.  Geithner told the panel that he disagrees with the latest Congressional Budget Office estimate that TARP will end up costing U.S. taxpayers $25 billion:

The Congressional Budget Office has estimated that taxpayers will lose $25 billion on the rescue of banks, other financial institutions and automakers that came in at the peak of the crisis in the fall of 2008.

Mr. Geithner told a hearing by a Congressionally appointed panel that it would cost less than that. “Those estimates are now around $25 billion,” Mr. Geithner said. “They are too high, in my judgment. Ultimately, they’ll be lower.”

Mr. Geithner did not provide another estimate.

Measured in cost, he said, the bailout “will rank as one of the most effective crisis-response programs ever implemented.” (Source)

Another story in Friday’s New York Times reported on two reports out of Europe detailing how Old World banks have to go to meet G20 agreed upon capital requirements.  Suffice to say, our European cousins are behind the effort to shore up big banks’ balance sheets.

[Read more...]

After A Weekend of Bad Press, Obama Officially ‘Outraged’ Too

I Think AIG Has the President’s Attention

Barack Obama From the Washington Post:

“Under these circumstances, it’s hard to understand how derivative traders at AIG warranted any bonuses, much less $165 million in extra pay,” Obama said. “How do they justify this outrage to the taxpayers who are keeping the company afloat?” He said he has asked Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner to “pursue every single legal avenue to block these bonuses and make the American taxpayers whole.”

Obama added: “What this situation also underscores is the need for overall financial regulatory reform, so we don’t find ourselves in this position again, and for some form of resolution mechanism in dealing with troubled financial institutions, so we’ve got greater authority to protect the American taxpayer and our financial system in cases such as this.”

Video: Ben Bernanke Interview on 60 Minutes – Depression Averted, Recovery Soon

Bernanke on 60 Minutes Part 1:


Watch CBS Videos Online

Bernanke on 60 Minutes Part 2:


Watch CBS Videos Online

Media – How Does It Feel To Be Managed Through the AIG Bonus Story

One thing I haven’t heard today regarding the over $100 million dollars the pigs at AIG are going to bonus themselves is any pushback at the company or at the U.S. Treasury Dept about they were managed through this thing.

There’s an old expression among flaks which goes something like this: “You take the trash out at 5 p.m. on Friday.”  Treasury Secretary Geithner did us one better this week with the AIG bonus story – Treasury took the trash out at around 8 p.m. Saturday night.  Taking the trash out means dumping the story you don’t want to have to talk much about when the media – and the public – are least attentive.

In reading through the dispatches today and watching the talking heads this a.m., it’s obvious Treasury knew what was up last Wednesday.  That is, last Wednesday Geithner and his lawyers realized they were punk’d by Ed Libby and AIG’s lawyers.  I can just imagine the final, behind the scenes discussion.  Tim Geithner, Wall Street Insider, asks AIG, America’s largest welfare case and Wall Street Personified, “Can we hold this til the weekend?  I’ll be out of the country and this will all blow over by Monday …”

Whether you are liberal or conservative, you’re job is to not let this blow over.  AIG are some of the guys who put the whole nation at economic – and therefore geopolitical – risk.

Today, one of the Administration’s talkers said we’re in something akin to wartime footing with regard to the economy.  While President Obama reads up on his Abraham Lincoln or FDR, he might take note that during a time of war the Executive Branch has been upheld in suspending some laws.  Perhaps AIG’s “contractual obligations” to the slicksters and scam artists in it’s financial services division could be declared null.

(UPDATED 1) Totally Unbelievable: AIG to Pay Out $100 Million in Bonuses To Its Financial Products Division

I am so angry right now, I can’t see straight and I may not be thinking clearly.

President Obama, this crap has got to stop.

The New York Times is reporting tonight that AIG, the world’s largest insurer and the original company deemed “too big to fail” will be paying out $100 million in bonuses shortly.  The government of the United States has shoveled $170 BILLION in AIG’s coffers since last fall in an effort to keep the company afloat.

A once venerable insurer, AIG began gambling on Wall Street some time ago in the credit default swap market.  These financial products, which are essentially insurance, are unregulated by the U.S.  According to multiple accounts in the media since last September, AIG is thought to have guaranteed trillions of dollars in these swaps.

Essentially, in a credit default swap, one party – the insurer – guarantees it will cover the full original value of a financial deal.  The purchaser of the swap pays a “premium” which is usually a percentage of the amount being guaranteed.  In the case of the current economic crisis, the financial deals being covered in these insurance gambles were the bundles of good and bad home loans – mortgage backed securities.  Companies like AIG thought they were raking in free money because, they believed, housing prices would continue to rise.  The housing bubble burst, the underlying bundles of loans became worthless and the swap purchasers are demanding their “insurance” settlements – the original values of the bundles of mortgages.  AIG and other financial institutions who sold credit default swaps don’t have the cash to make good on their obligations.

I fully understand “priming the pump” and the need for increased government spending to kick start a stalled economy.  I do not understand the unaccountable, opaque bailouts of private corporations.  I do not understand the total lack of accountability and justice for the companies like AIG who brought this mess down upon us.

The Times reports:

An official in the Obama administration said Saturday that Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner had called A.I.G.’s government-appointed chairman, Edward M. Liddy, on Wednesday and asked that the company renegotiate the bonuses.

Administration officials said they had managed to reduce some of the bonuses but had allowed most of them to go forward after the company’s chief executive said A.I.G. was contractually obligated to pay them.

In a letter to Mr. Geithner, Mr. Liddy wrote: “Needless to say, in the current circumstances, I do not like these arrangements and find it distasteful and difficult to recommend to you that we must proceed with them.”

Geithner “asked that the company renegotiate the bonuses?”  Are you fucking kidding me?  Geithner should have demanded that the bonuses not be paid.  Administration officials are actually taking this crap that AIG is “contractually obligated” to pay these pigs for screwing every single American taxpayer?  This financial crisis is a national emergency – I would expect that after $170 billion thrown down AIG’s maw we would have more leverage than to roll over because of a contractual obligation.  Where are the lawyers?

The one major disappointment I have with the Obama Administration is that the change we were promised is so far merely nibbling around the edges of the financial crisis.  For all of my conservative friends out there who wring their hands every time the word ‘nationalization’ comes up, this circumstance is what nationalization may cure.  This is our money being given to greedy pigs who are held harmless from the havoc they’ve wrought.  Temporary nationalization of these big companies would at least give our government control to go in and clean house.

If we don’t have the political will for nationalization or to hold Wall Streeters accountable, then it’s time to begin letting these companies go bankrupt.  Half the country seems to want this purity of the marketplace, give it to them.  If AIG were in bankruptcy, I believe these contractual obligations would go by the boards.

Update: 1 a.m. Sunday

The current version of the NYT story is now different from the block quote above.  I’ll bet there was some screaming from the Administration about Geithner ‘asking’ AIG to renegotiate bonuses.  The newer version of the story has Geithner portrayed as more forceful.  However, that doesn’t change a thing.  The newer version also points out that the U.S. government (us/we) own 80% of AIG.  If that’s the case, someone needs to have the stones to put a stop this sort of behavior.  AIG is not playing with their money now, they’re wasting ours.

From the Times:

Word of the bonuses last week stirred such deep consternation inside the Obama administration that Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner told the firm they were unacceptable and demanded they be renegotiated, a senior administration official said. But the bonuses will go forward because lawyers said the firm was contractually obligated to pay them.

The payments to A.I.G.’s financial products unit are in addition to $121 million in previously scheduled bonuses for the company’s senior executives and 6,400 employees across the sprawling corporation. Mr. Geithner last week pressured A.I.G. to cut the $9.6 million going to the top 50 executives in half and tie the rest to performance.

The payment of so much money at a company at the heart of the financial collapse that sent the broader economy into a tailspin almost certainly will fuel a popular backlash against the government’s efforts to prop up Wall Street. Past bonuses already have prompted President Obama and Congress to impose tough rules on corporate executive compensation at firms bailed out with taxpayer money.

A.I.G., nearly 80 percent of which is now owned by the government, defended its bonuses, arguing that they were promised last year before the crisis and cannot be legally canceled. In a letter to Mr. Geithner, Edward M. Liddy, the government-appointed chairman of A.I.G., said at least some bonuses were needed to keep the most skilled executives.