(UPDATED 1) Totally Unbelievable: AIG to Pay Out $100 Million in Bonuses To Its Financial Products Division

I am so angry right now, I can’t see straight and I may not be thinking clearly.

President Obama, this crap has got to stop.

The New York Times is reporting tonight that AIG, the world’s largest insurer and the original company deemed “too big to fail” will be paying out $100 million in bonuses shortly.  The government of the United States has shoveled $170 BILLION in AIG’s coffers since last fall in an effort to keep the company afloat.

A once venerable insurer, AIG began gambling on Wall Street some time ago in the credit default swap market.  These financial products, which are essentially insurance, are unregulated by the U.S.  According to multiple accounts in the media since last September, AIG is thought to have guaranteed trillions of dollars in these swaps.

Essentially, in a credit default swap, one party – the insurer – guarantees it will cover the full original value of a financial deal.  The purchaser of the swap pays a “premium” which is usually a percentage of the amount being guaranteed.  In the case of the current economic crisis, the financial deals being covered in these insurance gambles were the bundles of good and bad home loans – mortgage backed securities.  Companies like AIG thought they were raking in free money because, they believed, housing prices would continue to rise.  The housing bubble burst, the underlying bundles of loans became worthless and the swap purchasers are demanding their “insurance” settlements – the original values of the bundles of mortgages.  AIG and other financial institutions who sold credit default swaps don’t have the cash to make good on their obligations.

I fully understand “priming the pump” and the need for increased government spending to kick start a stalled economy.  I do not understand the unaccountable, opaque bailouts of private corporations.  I do not understand the total lack of accountability and justice for the companies like AIG who brought this mess down upon us.

The Times reports:

An official in the Obama administration said Saturday that Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner had called A.I.G.’s government-appointed chairman, Edward M. Liddy, on Wednesday and asked that the company renegotiate the bonuses.

Administration officials said they had managed to reduce some of the bonuses but had allowed most of them to go forward after the company’s chief executive said A.I.G. was contractually obligated to pay them.

In a letter to Mr. Geithner, Mr. Liddy wrote: “Needless to say, in the current circumstances, I do not like these arrangements and find it distasteful and difficult to recommend to you that we must proceed with them.”

Geithner “asked that the company renegotiate the bonuses?”  Are you fucking kidding me?  Geithner should have demanded that the bonuses not be paid.  Administration officials are actually taking this crap that AIG is “contractually obligated” to pay these pigs for screwing every single American taxpayer?  This financial crisis is a national emergency – I would expect that after $170 billion thrown down AIG’s maw we would have more leverage than to roll over because of a contractual obligation.  Where are the lawyers?

The one major disappointment I have with the Obama Administration is that the change we were promised is so far merely nibbling around the edges of the financial crisis.  For all of my conservative friends out there who wring their hands every time the word ‘nationalization’ comes up, this circumstance is what nationalization may cure.  This is our money being given to greedy pigs who are held harmless from the havoc they’ve wrought.  Temporary nationalization of these big companies would at least give our government control to go in and clean house.

If we don’t have the political will for nationalization or to hold Wall Streeters accountable, then it’s time to begin letting these companies go bankrupt.  Half the country seems to want this purity of the marketplace, give it to them.  If AIG were in bankruptcy, I believe these contractual obligations would go by the boards.

Update: 1 a.m. Sunday

The current version of the NYT story is now different from the block quote above.  I’ll bet there was some screaming from the Administration about Geithner ‘asking’ AIG to renegotiate bonuses.  The newer version of the story has Geithner portrayed as more forceful.  However, that doesn’t change a thing.  The newer version also points out that the U.S. government (us/we) own 80% of AIG.  If that’s the case, someone needs to have the stones to put a stop this sort of behavior.  AIG is not playing with their money now, they’re wasting ours.

From the Times:

Word of the bonuses last week stirred such deep consternation inside the Obama administration that Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner told the firm they were unacceptable and demanded they be renegotiated, a senior administration official said. But the bonuses will go forward because lawyers said the firm was contractually obligated to pay them.

The payments to A.I.G.’s financial products unit are in addition to $121 million in previously scheduled bonuses for the company’s senior executives and 6,400 employees across the sprawling corporation. Mr. Geithner last week pressured A.I.G. to cut the $9.6 million going to the top 50 executives in half and tie the rest to performance.

The payment of so much money at a company at the heart of the financial collapse that sent the broader economy into a tailspin almost certainly will fuel a popular backlash against the government’s efforts to prop up Wall Street. Past bonuses already have prompted President Obama and Congress to impose tough rules on corporate executive compensation at firms bailed out with taxpayer money.

A.I.G., nearly 80 percent of which is now owned by the government, defended its bonuses, arguing that they were promised last year before the crisis and cannot be legally canceled. In a letter to Mr. Geithner, Edward M. Liddy, the government-appointed chairman of A.I.G., said at least some bonuses were needed to keep the most skilled executives.

Must Read – Understanding the Problem with Banks and the Government

You should read the David M. Smick’s entire column, Tim Geithner’s Black Hole, over at the Washington Post.  Here’s an excerpt:

… The logical alternative — talk show hosts’ solution du jour — is to temporarily restructure or nationalize the banks and leave taxpayers alone. Remove the toxic assets, replace management and cut the too-big-to-fail financial dinosaurs into smaller, nimbler entities. Then reprivatize these smaller banks and let the recovery begin.

Oh, if it were that simple. I suspect Obama’s advisers would like nothing more than to dismantle an irresponsible firm such as Citigroup. They are afraid to do so, for one reason: All the big banks are connected to a potentially lethal web of paper insurance instruments called credit default swaps. These paper derivatives have become our financial system’s new master.

The theory holds that dismantling a big bank could unravel this paper market, with catastrophic global financial consequences. Or not. Nobody knows, because the market for these unregulated financial derivatives, amounting potentially to over $40 trillion (by comparison, global gross domestic product is now not much more than $60 trillion), is the financial equivalent of uncharted waters. …

Some Clear Thinking on the Financial Mess from Norris and Krugman

I read both of these columns in last Friday’s edition of the New York Times.  It’s the end of a historic year for the U.S. economy.  We may look back in a few years and say that 2008 was the beginning of the end for supply-side economics (trickle down) and a nearly wholly unregulated financial services system.  2008 will hopefully become known as the time when ordinary people got concerned enough about the price they were paying for the excesses of banks which traded stocks, brokerages which sold insurance and insurance companies which did both.  2008 was a year when ordinary folks began to understand mortgage backed securities and credit default swaps – and what the failure of those derivatives meant for their local widget makers’ line of credit.

If you don’t read anything else today, read these two columns:

• Op-Ed, Floyd Norris: A year of financial contradictions and chaos - New York Times
• Op-Ed, Paul Krugman: The Madoff Economy – The New York Times

Read more

U.S. and World Markets Poised for Another Rocky Week

Hong Market Plunges Most Since 1989 Tiananmen Crackdown
– Bloomberg

Global markets continue slide, U.S. futures off 4%
- New York Times

‘Dr. Doom’ doesn’t see things getting better yet – Times of London

Grim GDP figures shows U.K. on verge of recession
– Times of London

Forecasters race to call the bottom
– New York Times

Last night, CBS News’ 60 Minutes ran another great, explanatory piece on how the investment class nearly ruined our economy. Check it out below:

Watch CBS Videos Online

For an explanation of credit default swaps go here.

The $50 Trillion Swindle the Investment Class Doesn’t Have Us on the Hook For – Yet

Credit Default Swaps and the Potential Cost of a Las Vegas Financial System

If you’ve been paying any attention to my posts and choice of content over the last two weeks, you know I’m not for the current $700 billion federal bailout of Wall Street which is underway thanks to the jackasses in Washington – and I’m talking all of them regardless of party.

Granted, I’m not a financial expert. But, I have tried to educate myself, and this bailout just seems to be rewarding bad behavior with worse public policy. One book I’m about done with is Kevin Phillips’ Bad Money. This book is currently ranked 63 on Amazon and I highly recommend it. At any rate, just when I was getting resigned to the fact the bailout is now a fact of life, and there’s nothing I can do about it, I got a little more education this weekend.

On Sunday morning, I heard the latest edition of This American Life. Part of the show dealt with the impending doom that is ‘credit default swaps.’ You should give this show a listen online. Ira Glass’s gang simply defines and exposes the scope of the risk out there with these ’swaps.’ Later in the day came this report by 60 Minutes. This is another great piece of journalism exposing the problem with these financial vehicles. So, what are they – and why should we care?

Let’s say I’m a hedge fund and I have $1 billion wrapped up in a collateralized debt obligation (CDO) – aka a bunch of mortgages bundled together, many of which are shit. Lehman Brothers or CitiGroup comes to me and says, “We will insure you against loss for 2% of what you paid for the CDO.” I’m a little worried about the underlying assets in the CDO, so I say, sure, and fork over $20 million. CitiGroup has now made $20 million for nothing. When banks, investment banks, and hedge funds were doing these deals, they were merely placing a bet that the CDOs they were “insuring” wouldn’t tank.

We know what’s been happening. There’s more junk in the CDOs than anyone realized or cared to admit. I believe part of the reason Lehman failed is that the folks they sold credit default swaps to began to come calling for their insurance payout. But wait, I’m talking about insurance, right? Why are they called ’swaps?’ Simply put, if they called it insurance, it would be regulated, ie. the Lehmans of the world would have to show capital, or a risk reserve fund, backing up their deals. That’s cash. They call them swaps so the whole transaction remains the unregulated, gambling pile of poo that it is.

So far, taxpayers, we’re on the hook for $700 billion. If you watch the 60 Minutes segment, you’ll find out that the estimated value of all the credit default swaps out there in the world’s markets is around $50 trillion. That’s a “T” and an “R” at the beginning of that “illion.” How many more of the “insured” are going to demand payment from the underwriters of these swaps? How many more banks, insurance companies, or investment houses are going under? Who is going to pay for that?