Sunday Papers – November 9, 2008

New York Times Magazine

New York Times

Washington Post

Los Angeles Times

Share/Save/Bookmark

Why I’m Voting for Obama – Reason 2 of 3 – Our Standing in the World

Where you can blame about half of our economic woes on Congress and Clinton-era policies, there is no doubt that our poor standing within the family of nations lies squarely at the feet of Bush and Cheney. Around the world we are either derisively snickered at for being brutish or boorish, or, worse, feared or hated. The tragedy is that sometimes the fear and hate are born of events and rational analysis due to our seeming irrational actions in places like Iraq. Read more

Share/Save/Bookmark

News – Strickland, DHL, Palin in Lebanon, Obama in Ohio, ODOT, Brunner and ballots, Space, Husted, Kim Jong-Il Revered Glorious Leader, Hurricane Ike, Pakistan-Afghanistan, U.S. Budget Deficit

Ohio News

Dear Politicians: Charter Schools are the easy way out. Fix public education.

Hurricane Ike

 

 

 

 

 

 

World News

Has Zadari told the ISI?

Thanks, Shrub! We’re not only safer because you created terrorists over there in Iraq so you could talk about not having to fight them here … you’ve left us bankrupt! You Jackass.

Share/Save/Bookmark

Thursday A.M. Read – Sick Days, Dimora, Uninsured, Brunner, Marc Dann!, Russia v. Georgia, Rice, McCain, Energy Policy

Ohio News

National/International News

Share/Save/Bookmark

Sunday Night Last Look – More housing market trouble, Taliban, Malwebolence

August 3, 2008 by Pelikan · Leave a Comment
Filed under: Bush Foreign Policy, Terrorism, U.S. Economy 

From the New York Times

Share/Save/Bookmark

The Case Against Torture – Transcript: Bill Moyers inverview of Jane Mayer

July 26, 2008 by Pelikan · Leave a Comment
Filed under: Bush Foreign Policy, Iraq, Terrorism 

Jane Mayer, a writer with the New Yorker and formerly of the Wall Street Journal has published her new book, The Dark Side: The Inside Story of How the War on Terror Turned Into a War on American Ideals. She was interviewed Friday night on Bill Moyers’ Journal on PBS. Moyers’ report on the Congressional hearings on Bush Administration-sanctioned torture and lengthy interview with Mayer was riveting television. It also made me feel like I’ve been tuned out of a debate that no American should ignore.

The U.S. House Judiciary Committee subcommittee which conducted the hearings on torture, detainee treatment, etc., did so over the course of around six weeks. They should have had these four hearings, back to back, four days in a row and gotten more of the public’s attention to this issue.

Philippe Sands, a University College of London law professor has also written a book detailing story behind the so-called torture memo signed by then SecDef Rumsfeld. Material from Sands’ book, Torture Team, became this article in Vanity Fair.

 

Now is the point in the post where I should write something about the rule of law, unintended consequences, and a presidency which tramples the Constitution, U.S. and international law. But, Sands said it best in his prepared testimony before the House Judiciary Committee:

From these conversations it became clear to me that the Administration has spun a narrative that is false, claiming that the impetus for the new interrogation techniques came from the bottom-up. That is not true: the abuse was a result of pressures and actions driven from the highest levels of government. The Administration claims that it simply followed the law. My investigation indicated that – driven by ideology – the Administration consciously sought legal advice to set aside international constraints on detainee interrogations. The Administration relied on a small number of political appointees, lawyers with no real background in military law, with extreme views on executive power, and with an abiding contempt for international rules like the Geneva Conventions. These are rules that the United States has done more to promote and put in place than maybe any other country. As result, under international law war crimes were committed: I have no doubt that Common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions was violated, alongside provisions of the 1984 Convention prohibiting Torture. The spectre of war crimes was raised by US Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy, in the 2006 judgment in Hamdan v Rumsfeld. That judgment corrected the illegality of President Bush’s determination that none of the detainees at Guantanamo had any rights under Geneva.

For the complete transcript of Bob Moyers’ interview of Jane Mayer Read more

Share/Save/Bookmark

Tuesday A.M. – National City, State Board of Education, Bernanke, Madrassas, General Motors, Offshore Drilling

Share/Save/Bookmark

Monday Evening – More Fannie, More Freddie; Afghan War; Useless Drilling; Mountain Lion

July 14, 2008 by Pelikan · 1 Comment
Filed under: Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, Peak Oil, U.S. Economy 

Clear- headed column by Paul Krugman points out that Fannie and Freddie operate under federal regulations that forbid them from buying subprime loans. So, how did we get to this point, Krugman writes in part:

Part of the answer is the sheer scale of the housing bubble, and the size of the price declines taking place now that the bubble has burst. In Los Angeles, Miami and other places, anyone who borrowed to buy a house at the peak of the market probably has negative equity at this point, even if he or she originally put 20 percent down. The result is a rising rate of delinquency even on loans that meet Fannie-Freddie guidelines.

Also, Fannie and Freddie, while tightly regulated in terms of their lending, haven’t been required to put up enough capital — that is, money raised by selling stock rather than borrowing. This means that even a small decline in the value of their assets can leave them underwater, owing more than they own.

Any oil production from new offshore drilling will come online and the oil into the market in about 10 years. This is a cynical, political ploy. The combined estimated production of U.S. offshore drilling and drilling in ANWR would barely dent our dependence on foreign oil or add enough oil to general supplies to make more than a minor dent in consumer prices. It’s past time to realize that we’re on the downward slope of the oil economy. Politicians who support this sort of drilling are either bought and paid for by the petroleum industry or offering false hope in order to get votes or create the appearance they are doing something.

Share/Save/Bookmark

Heading for 2001 All Over Again?

July 7, 2008 by Pelikan · Leave a Comment
Filed under: Bush Foreign Policy, Terrorism 

On Sunday 11 people, mostly police officers were killed by a suicide bomber in Islamabad, Pakistan. Today, in Kabul, Afghanistan, 41 people were killed by a car bomb outside the gates of the Indian embassy. Also on Monday, six small explosions wounded 37 in Karachi, Pakistan. Nearly seven years after 9/11 and Al Qaeda’s brand of militant Islam is stronger than ever.

The Kabul bombing is being reported as the largest such attack since U.S. and allied forces toppled the Taliban from power in 2001. That 2001 campaign showed the American intelligence community and military at its best. The problem is, the war in Iraq sucked all the oxygen out of the Afghani room for too long. The Taliban is resurgent. Along with the remnants of Al Qaeda, the Taliban reconstituted itself just across the border in Pakistan. The New York Times reported on June 30 that among other things terrorist training camps – albeit smaller – have also been rebuilt in Pakistan’s semi-autonomous tribal regions.

That article, which you can read here, also outlines several other disturbing trends in Bush administration foreign policy which seem to mirror the mistakes made by the Clinton and Bush administrations leading up to 9/11.

The New York Times documents several instances of bureaucratic infighting among the intelligence and military arms in the U.S. war on terrorism. Although the Clinton administration’s problem was with White House approval for the trigger to be pulled on Bin Laden or other terrorist targets, the problem this time seems to be more internecine. The Times’ story recounts conflict between the CIA’s own field operations in Kabul and Islamabad. At other times the Pentagon has stood in the way of Special Forces operations planned for inside the Pakistani tribal areas. After all this time and money, the U.S. government still cannot operate efficiently or make crucial decisions at the right moment as it regards the military and intelligence communities, covert operations, and the proper use of military power.

This state of affairs is not what we were promised after 9/11 or after the release of the 9/11 Commission Report in July of 2004.

Read more

Share/Save/Bookmark